![]() |
|---|
IRELAND IN THE 1800s
England governed Ireland From 1691 to 1829 under statutes commonly known as PENAL LAWS "Laws in Ireland For The Suppression of Popery"
These laws were statutes passed by the Protestant Parliament of Ireland in the reigns of Queen Elizabeth I, William and Mary, King William III, Queen Anne, King George I and II. They sprung from the consolidation of English power in 1691 and were still "on the books" until Catholic Emancipation in 1829. They regulated the status of Roman Catholics. To be sure, the Penal System started well before 1691. From the beginning of the English Reformation, laws establishing a particular religion and punishing those who did not conform were passed in England and in Ireland. In addition to laws against Catholics, there were statutes relating to Jews, Protestant Dissenters (non-Anglicans), and Quakers. In addition, many of the Irish and Irish-related laws from the second half of the seventeenth century were bound up in the settlement of the estates forfeited after the various wars of that period. Religion was the chasm which divided the colonial rulers of Ireland from the native Irish majority. This sectarian division resulted from deliberate government policy. The declared purpose of the Irish Penal Laws, like that of the apartheid laws of recent South African history, was to disenfranchise the native majority from all power, both political and economic. Unlike apartheid, the disabilities created by the Penal Laws were aimed not at a particular race or ethnic group, but at the adherents of a particular religion: Roman Catholics. The ideal was to entice the colonised Irish into wholesale conversion to Protestantism. A Catholic could avoid the oppressive effects of these laws by conversion, although the statutes went to great lengths to ferret out insincere conversions and backsliders. By deliberately defining the haves and the have-nots, the politically powerful and the oppressed, on the basis of religion, these statutes had a profound effect, not only on the eighteenth century, but on the subsequent history of Ireland to the present day. THE POPERY CODE
This is an abstract from the Bill of 1704: "Where as it is notoriously known that the late rebellions in this kingdom have been contrived, promoted and carried on by Popish archbishops, bishops, Jesuits and other ecclesiastical persons of the Romish clergy, and forasmuch as the peace and public safety of the kingdom is in danger, by the great number of the said archbishops which, not only endeavor to withdraw His Majesty's subjects from their obedience, but do daily stir up and move sedition and rebellion...
THE ACT OF UNION: 1 JANUARY 1801 "The Creation of the United Kingdom of Great Britian and Ireland"
The 1801 Act of Union established that: * Ireland was joined to Great Britain into a single kingdom: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. * The Dublin parliament was abolished. Ireland was represented at Westminster by 100 MPs, 4 Lords Spiritual and 28 Lords Temporal (all were Anglicans). * The Anglican Church was recognized as the official Church of Ireland. * There was free trade between Ireland and Britain. * Ireland was to keep a separate Exchequer and was responsible for two-seventeenths of the general expense of the United Kingdom. * Ireland kept its own Courts of Justice and civil service. * No Catholics were to be allowed to hold public office. * There was to be no Catholic Emancipation. Ruling Ireland direct from Westminster solved nothing. The union was a political expedient in wartime, solving none of the grievances in Ireland over land, religion or politics. It had no social dimension at all. Ireland's economic problems were also ignored. The Act did increase the sense of grievance in Ireland however.
CATHOLIC EMANCIPATION: 13 APRIL 1829 "An Act for the Relief of His Majesty’s Roman Catholic Subjects (13 April 1829)"
The Catholic Relief Act 1829 was passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom on 24 March 1829, and received the Royal Assent on 13 April. It was the culmination of the process of Catholic Emancipation in the United Kingdom, and in Ireland it repealed the last of the Penal Laws. Its passage followed a campaign on the issue by Irish lawyer and newly elected Member of Parliament Daniel O'Connell. The act allowed Catholics to have a seat in parliament. This condition was crucial as Daniel O'Connell had won a seat in a by-election in County Clare but under British law he was forbidden (because of his religion) to take his seat in Westminster. Sir Robert Peel, who had for all of his career opposed emancipation (and had, in 1815, challenged O'Connell to a duel) was forced to conclude: "though emancipation was a great danger, civil strife was a greater danger." Fearing a revolution in Ireland, Peel drew up the Catholic Relief Bill and guided it through the House of Commons. To overcome the opposition of both the House of Lords and King George IV, the Duke of Wellington worked to ensure passage in the House of Lords, and threatened to resign as Prime Minister if the King did not give Royal Assent. The Catholic Relief Act was a compromise, however, and effectively disenfranchised the Catholic peasants of Ireland, the so-called Forty Shilling Freeholders. The act raised fivefold the economic qualifications for voting. Starting in 1793, any man renting or owning land worth at least forty shillings (the equivalent of two Pounds Sterling), had been permitted to vote. Under the Catholic Relief Act, this was raised to ten pounds. It was emancipation at a price because the Irish electorate was cut drastically.
IRELAND: IMPORTANT DATES 1800-1850 "What was Happening During The TImes of Our Ancestors' Emigration to England"
1800 Act of Union abolishes Dublin parliament, allows Irish MPs to sit at Westminster and ends trade barriers 1812-18 Peel is Chief Secretary for Ireland 1814 formation of the Peace Preservation Corps 1815 end of the French Wars leads to collapse of corn prices, beginning of expansion of pastoral farming and of substantial Irish emigration 1816 partial failure of potato crop produces famine conditions in parts of Ireland. Relief Committees set up. 1810s/20s collapse of domestic textile industry 1816 Ejectment Act makes process for legal eviction easier 1817 near-famine and mass immigration increase. 1821 population about 6.7 million 1820s-1845 widespread rural unrest (Whiteboyism) 1822 formation of the Irish County Constabulary. Further failure of potato crop. Major public works programme started to provide employment 1823 O'Connell's Catholic Association formed to fight for the right of Catholics to sit as MPs and hold public office (emancipation) 1826 Subletting Act attempts to stamp out subletting 1828 O'Connell elected at the County Clare election 1829 Catholic Emancipation Act 1831 National Board of Education was set up to promote a national system of elementary, secular schooling to attack widespread illiteracy and ignorance (both of which were perceived as caused of backwardness and unruliness) 1836 Irish Constabulary founded 1838 Poor Law introduced to Ireland 1840 'Young Ireland' founded 1841 population about 8.2 million 1844 Young Ireland movement breaks away from O'Connell 1845 Maynooth grant increased 1845-49 1845 partial failure of potato crop 1846-9 complete failure of crop leads to widespread deaths, evictions and emigration 1848 Young Ireland's abortive rebellion 1849 Encumbered Estates Act leads to massive land sales 1849 Tenant League formed demanding the 'Three F's' 1851 population 6.4 million
THE LAND: IT'S ALL ABOUT THE LAND! "Land-holding in Ireland 1760-1880"
It is substantailly correct to assume that, in the case of land holding, Ireland was under the domination of the English aristocracy and the country had been divided up into huge estates, especially in Ulster and the east of Ireland. These had been handed over to English and Scottish Protestant supporters (Planters) of the English monarch since Elizabeth I, in the attempt to subdue Ireland and abolish Roman Catholicism in Britain. Most noble landowners were absentees, employing agents in Ireland. The Irish could rent, but not own, farms. They became "tenants at will": i.e. they had no security of tenure. They could be (and were) evicted as soon as their rents fell into arrears. After 1780 rack-renting became very common because of population growth. Estates were often poorly managed, with much sub-letting of land. Tenants had no incentive to improve their land or houses because then the rent would be raised and if they could not pay or fell into arrears, they would be evicted without compensation for the work they had done. Not all of these "landed gentlemen" were grasping landlords, e.g., the Marquis of Rockingham who owned vast estates in Wicklow. But many landlords are remembered for their ill-treatment of their tenants. Landowners Until about 1900 the greater part of the land in Ireland (97% in 1870) was owned by men who rented it out to tenant farmers rather than cultivating it themselves. As in England, the individual wealth of members of the land-owning class varied considerably, depending on the size, quality and location of properties. Smaller landlords in the east, in Ulster or on the outskirts of towns were more favourably placed than the owners of tracts of infertile bog in the west. There were probably fewer than 10,000 proprietors of 100 or more acres in 1830 but this number included many who owned relatively small estates and a few aristocratic magnates. In 1870 302 proprietors (1.5% of the total) owned 33.7% of the land, and 50% of the country was in the hands of 750 families. At the other end of the scale, 15,527 (80.5%) owned between them only 19.3% of the land. Absenteeism was a universal practice in Ireland and detrimental to the country's progress. Absenteeism was prevalent in England too: large tracts of the north of England were devoid of resident landowners, and in parts of Lincolnshire in the mid-Nineteenth century only 7% of parishes had permanently resident substantial landowners. If a man owned several estates, by definition if he was living on one of them he was an absentee on all the others. Before 1845 an estimated 33% to 50% of Irish landowners were absentees, and a substantial portion of these were internal absentees (i.e. landlords who lived elsewhere in Ireland). Half the country was owned by men who lived on or near their estates. Absenteeism did not necessarily bring about inefficient estate management or rack-renting. Most substantial proprietors employed land stewards to manage their lands. When these men's enthusiasm for efficiency, maximization of rental income or both overcame their caution or humanity, aggrieved tenants could and did turn to the absentee landlord as an appeal judge. Permanent absentees were usually the larger and possibly more financially secure landowners who may have had less reason to raise rents and more funds to improve their estates. Some of the most infamous landlords who experienced the full force of tenant opposition during the Land War crisis of 1879-82 were permanently resident on their estates. The fiercest critics of absentees for much of the century were not farmers but resident landlords who felt that they were unfairly expected to shoulder unpalatable, time-consuming, local, social and political responsibilities for which they received no reward and scant recognition. During the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries the British government had confiscated a great deal of land owned by Catholics and enacted penal laws restricting land-ownership to Protestants. Although some of these Acts had been repealed, starting in 1778, few Catholics purchased land before the famine because estates were too expensive. The situation was eased somewhat by the 1849 Encumbered Estates Act. Almost without exception landowners were in debt. During the famine, landlords' incomes collapsed as thousands of small tenants defaulted on their rent, and this was accompanied by a huge rise in emigrations. The system of poor relief introduced into Ireland in 1838 was financed out of local rates, a tax levied on occupiers of property. The poor were exempted from paying this tax if the property they inhabited was valued at less than £4 p.a. for rental purposes; the landlords were committed to paying their rates. Consequently the cost of relieving the destitution after 1845 fell on the landlords. In an attempt to reduce the number of paupers in areas for which they were responsible, landlords resorted to eviction. Tenants It is commonplace to portray Ireland as a country of peasants, poor subsistence farmers eking out a precarious existence on small patches of land, generally planted with potatoes, and uninvolved in the market economy except in so far as they were obliged to pay rent to landlords and taxes to Church and State. In reality rural society was far more complex than this, with no clear distinctions between classes and significant variations between regions and time. The majority of the population in pre-famine Ireland had little or no access to land. They lived in appalling conditions. 40% of Irish houses in 1841 were one room mud cabins with natural earth floors, no windows and no chimneys. Furniture and cooking facilities in these hovels were primitive. Their inhabitants' diet was monotonous and increasingly inadequate. Apart from beggars and paupers, virtually landless labourers (cottiers) occupied the lowest rung on the social ladder: there were 596,000 of them in the 1841 Census, and they comprised the largest single occupational/social group in the country. They faced a shrinking demand for their services after the French Wars as domestic industry declined and corn-growing contracted. Before 1838, irregularly employed married men relied on small potato plots for survival. These were often rented on a yearly basis from local farmers and paid for by labour services, a system known as conacre. Smallholders numbered 408,000 in 1841. Of these 65,000 had holdings of less than 1 acre, and were virtually indistinguishable from the cottiers. Many had to rely on access to income from elsewhere, such as peat-digging or using waste-land for common grazing, domestic industry (which was declining anyway), kelp collecting, fishing (where possible) or seasonal work on large farms. Smallholders with between 6 and 15 acres were classed as small farmers. Whatever the size of their holdings, virtually none had written agreements with their landlords to give them legal security of tenure. The sad plight of these groups dominates contemporary and much historical writing, but they did not constitute the entire population, and their numbers and economic significance declined from the mid-century. Some 453,000 were returned in the 1841 Census as "Farmers" and ranked as men of some standing and wealth. They had a comfortable standard of living, participated in local and national politics, supported and financed the Catholic Church, arranged beneficial marriages for their children and provided social leadership in the absence of local landowners. Sometimes they were also landlords to the smallholders and cottiers, subletting land which they rented on long leases from the landowner. Examples of how small the holdings became: * in 1770 a farm was let to one family. By 1845 there were over 300 inhabitants, most of them sub-tenants of the original leaseholder. * in 1843 there were 12,529 tenants on the Trinity College estate, but only 1% of these paid their rent to the college; 45% were sub-tenants of this small number and over 52% were sub-tenants of the sub-tenants. Throughout the Nineteenth Century, Connaught and Ulster had much higher proportions of smallholders than Munster and Leinster. The land in the west was infertile and had unreliable communications, and conditions there closely matched the popular image of peasant Ireland. Anti-landlord propaganda which portrayed tenants as powerless victims of landlord oppression had been a major influence on both political and historical approaches to the subject. Landlords traditionally have been found guilty of several related crimes against the Irish tenants. The rents they charged have generally been considered to have been excessively high, bordering on legalised robbery. Even if their tenants paid these extortionate rents they are reputed to have lived under permanent threat of eviction, without notice or reason, since landlords regularly resorted to widespread and indiscriminate clearances. Such practices were not only morally indefensible but also economically ruinous, starving the countryside of capital, eroding the tenant farmers' incentive to invest. Ireland's poverty, even the famine itself was, therefore, the ultimate responsibility of the land-owning class. However pastoral farming offered less scope for investment, and investment was restricted by landlords' indebtedness and the persistence in some areas of small-scale, uneconomic holdings. By making the financial transactions between landlord and tenant one-directional, it gave credibility to the image of the landlord as a non-productive parasite. There is insufficient information of the level of evictions in the first half of the Nineteenth Century from which to make generalizations. Evictions were not frequent until after 1815, and many were probably carried out by the larger tenant farmers who had sub-let their holdings. Landowners often found it difficult or distasteful to resort to massive evictions. Concerned landlords realized that in the absence of other employment, those deprived of access to land would have no means of survival. Some offered dispossessed tenants free subsidized passages to North America, or attempted to encourage local industry. Others simply tried to stop sub-letting. It now seems that the wholesale clearances and forced evictions which occurred in the Highlands of Scotland at this time were not repeated in Ireland. During the famine years and the Land War of 1879-82 evictions were common, although at other times the widely reported threats of ejectment were intended to be, and were generally accepted as final demands for payment, and were treated as such. Few were actually translated into eviction. Although tenants had no legally binding, written agreements which guaranteed security of tenure, most came to expect to be able to retain possession of their farms so long as they paid their rents. The legislation of 1870 and 1881, therefore, effectively gave legal backing to practices which already existed. While it is impossible to refute the findings of such detailed official enquiries as the Devonshire Commission of 1844 which stressed the poverty and misery of the majority of the Irish people, it would be wrong to assume that all of the population suffered or that conditions remained unchanged in subsequent decades. The tenant farmers for whom Gladstone sought justice after 1870 were far from exploited or impoverished.
|
|---|
THE IRISH FAMINES: 1800-1845
The 'Great Hunger' was one of many famines in Ireland during the first half of the nineteenth century, but the size of the disaster dwarfed those that preceded it. A contemporary comment was that "God sent the blight, but the English made the famine": and to some extent this was true because the governments of both Peel and Lord John Russell did little to help the Irish population. Famine and emigration hit Ireland: 1817 There were bad harvests in Ireland in 1815 and 1816, resulting in near-famine conditions in 1817. Consequently, emigration levels increased dramatically. During the French Wars, the Irish economy had thrived since the country supplied much of the foodstuff required by the British army. The demand for food had increased employment in Ireland; however, at the end of the wars in 1815, with the Battle of Waterloo, the Irish economy had been hit by depression. Unemployment increased at a time when soldiers and sailors were being demobilised, causing further distress. Shipowners took advantage of the situation, offering low prices and passage to places such as New Brunswick and Quebec, where the Irish could go for only £5 instead of the £10 needed to sail to America. However, many Irish emigrants went to Scotland and England because it was cheaper. Since shortage of money was a major problem, the few shillings needed to sail to Liverpool was all most emigrants could afford. Most emigrants were labourers or servants. The trend towards emigration to escape the abject poverty in Ireland was to continue throughout the nineteenth century.
|
IRISH AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS IN 1843
In 1835, Alexis de Tocqueville toured Ireland and wrote of his experiences. What he saw was not to the credit of the British government. However, parliament in Westminster did not appear to have any idea of the appalling conditions that existed in Ireland. In 1843, the Devonshire Commission was established to report into conditions in Ireland in terms of landholding and the law. This extract was written by Captain Kennedy just after the outbreak of the potato blight. Kennedy was Secretary to the Commission. It has been stated almost universally throughout the evidence, that the lands in nearly every district of Ireland require drainage; that the drainage and deep moving of the lands or subsoiling have proved most remunerative operations wherever they have been applied; that these operations have as yet been introduced but to a very limited extent. That the mass of the lands is held by small working farmers. That the small farmers and labourers are for considerable portions of the year in search of employment which they cannot obtain. That the most valuable crops and the most profitable rotations cannot be adopted on wet lands, &c., &c. These apparent contradictions are variously accounted for by different witnesses. Some attributing the apathy that exists to want of capital, which they strongly recommend to be supplied in some way or other. But this cause would not prevent the small farmer from draining the wet field of which he is the occupier, and which is situated at his own door, instead of sitting idle for several months of the year, and complaining all the while that he cannot find profitable employment! Others, and by far the most extensive class of witnesses, attribute the inertia to the fact of the occupiers not having any certainty of receiving compensation, if removed immediately after having effected valuable improvements; and to their not generally having leases, or that security of tenure of their farms which would justify them in expending labour or money in their improvement, as, if they did so, the proprietor would then have the power of immediately increasing the rent. A close analysis of this subject would probably lead to the conclusion, that the potato is the main cause of that inertia in the population, and that want of improvement in the lands and tillage, which is so striking throughout Ireland. This root, as compared with other food stuffs grown in this climate, supplied the largest amount of human food on the smallest surface. Its peculiar cultivation enabled the occupier of land to plant it in the wettest soils; because the ridge or lazy bed, universally adopted in such cases, supplied the most minute system of drainage that can be imagined for that one crop, although it did not permanently drain the land, or extend any substantial benefit in that respect even to the following crop. The indolent occupier, therefore, passed his winter inactively, consuming this food which he preferred to all others, and neglecting to prepare his land permanently for more profitable crops, of which he had heard little, and for which he cared less. Enjoying all the while the pleasing delusion, that, as sure as the spring came round, any portion he might select of his farm would be ready to receive his favourite root, and to furnish a certain supply of food for his numerous and increasing family. Digest of Evidence on Occupation of Land in Ireland (1847), Pt. I, 14-16
THE DEVONSHIRE REPORT The condition of the labourers in Ireland (1845) In 1844 Sir Robert Peel had ordered an enquiry into conditions in Ireland, under the chairmanship of the Earl of Devon. The Report came too late to help the Irish population which was hard-hit by the potato blight of 1845. This is part of the original Report. We must not omit to notice the system which prevails in a greater or less degree in every part of Ireland, of letting land for one or more crops, commonly known as the con-acre system. The land so let is in some few districts called quarter land or rood land. Much has been said in condemnation of this system; but still we are convinced that some practice of this nature is essential to the comfort, almost the existence, of the Irish peasant. Under ordinary circumstances the wages of his labour alone will not enable him to purchase food and other necessaries, and to pay even the most moderate rent. It becomes therefore necessary that he should resort to some other means for procuring subsistence, and these can only be found in the occupation of a piece of ground which shall furnish a crop of potatoes for food. This he generally takes from some farmer in the neighbourhood, upon conditions which vary much according to the particular terms of agreement respecting the ploughing, the manure, the seed, &c. Although the taker of con-acre ground may, in ordinary years, receive a good return for the rent which he assumes, yet, as the amount of such rent, although not unreasonable in respect of the farmer's expenditure upon the land, is always large with reference to the ordinary means of a labourer, a bad season, and a failure in the crops, leave the latter in a distressed condition, subject to a demand which he is wholly unable to meet. Report of the Commissioners: Devonshire Commission, 1151-2
Conacre This is a term used to describe land rented for the taking of a single crop, most commonly potatoes. Conacre was taken by tradesmen and small farmers but most usually by agricultural labourers who invested all or most of their earnings in potato ground from which to feed their families. The practice illustrates the limited rôle of retail markets in pre-Famine rural Ireland. Conacre rents were a frequent cause of agrarian violent, as population pressure increased. Farmers were encouraged by price trends to move into livestock farming and no longer found conacre lettings a profitable means of providing crop rotation. |
POLITICS DURING THE FAMINE
The Catholic Association (1823-) In 1823 the Catholic Association was set up by Daniel O'Connell. All Irish citizens were encouraged to join. They paid a 'Catholic rent' of 1d per month, collected after Mass on Sunday, which financed the Association's activities and was used as an insurance fund for members who were evicted for being members of the Association. The priesthood was won over and churches became a propaganda vehicle for the Association and many joined the Association as a religious crusade. Catholics had little to lose and all to gain. In its first year of existence the Association had an income of £1,000 per week (960,000 pennies a month) and at the end of the year it had £10,000 invested. O'Connell realised that a successful campaign needed money to pay for speakers, pamphlets and so on. The campaign was non-violent but agitation was constant and by 1825 the Association was so active that it was declared to be illegal. O'Connell simply changed its name and continued as before. Also in 1825 Sir Francis Burdett proposed another Emancipation Bill. It passed the Commons but was rejected by the Lords. O'Connell felt that there was a need for fully committed believers in emancipation in the Commons, so the Association influenced elections by encouraging Irish voters to elect only pro-emancipation candidates in the 1826 election. Candidates pledged to support emancipation were elected at Louth and Waterford. The Catholic Association's great triumph came when Wellington's government passed the Catholic Emancipation Act in 1829 following the County Clare election in which O'Connell won a huge majority over Vesey Fitzgerald.
Peel and Ireland (1841-6) Daniel O'Connell could expect little from Sir Robert Peel and the Conservatives because they wanted to maintain the Act of Union. Also, it was O'Connell who had labelled Peel "Orange Peel", and had been party to the Lichfield House Compact to oust Peel from office. There was no love lost between the two men. The Irish showed little enthusiasm for the repeal of the Act of Union: the 1841 general election returned only 12 repeal candidates (of the 40 who stood). The Catholic rent which O'Connell had established in 1823 with the establishment of the Catholic Association diminished too - and this was O'Connell's main source of income. O'Connell was 65 years old and could not wait for another Whig government. He knew that the Whigs would not support repeal, but O'Connell remembered that Wellington and Peel had conceded emancipation in 1828-9 under the threat of civil war. O'Connell declared that 1843 was to be the year of the 'great repeal' and organised monster meetings all over Ireland to whip up support. Funds increased, but O'Connell came into conflict with the younger, new men who called themselves "Young Ireland". "Young Ireland" was made up of men of a different generation from O'Connell. The leaders were predominantly intellectuals and journalists: the Protestant poet Thomas Davis; the Catholics Charles Gavan Duffy and John Blake Dillon. The Presbyterian republican John Mitchel [sic]; the Protestant landowner William Smith O'Brien later joined them. These men had seen nationalist movements such as "Young Italy" at work in Europe but had not seen the terror and aftermath of rebellion in Ireland. They thought in terms of an independent Irish nation, rather than in terms of Irishmen. Most of "Young Ireland" could not speak or understand Gaelic - the language spoken by half the Irish population - and saw the repeal struggle very differently from O'Connell. They stressed Irish culture and the differences between England and Ireland in race, religion, language and outlook. "Young Ireland" had little constructive ability and continually quarrelled among themselves. They did little for Ireland except that they gave birth to the policy of violence deliberately directed against the government. Their journal, The Nation, at least published good poetry but preached hatred of the English. They made it impossible for the British government to cure Irish discontent by kindness. Disputes between O'Connell and "Young Ireland" began over the character of repeal agitation. O'Connell thought that Peel would give way before civil war broke out. In October 1843 O'Connell had called a mass meeting at Clontarf. Peel's government banned the meeting and O'Connell complied with the law but was arrested anyway. He was found guilty of many charges by a packed jury and was sentenced to one year in prison and a fine of £2,000. The verdict was quashed on an appeal to the House of Lords, but O'Connell was broken as a political power in Ireland. Power and influence passed to "Young Ireland". Peel reacted to events in Ireland by * passing an Arms Act Peel wanted to make concessions, so in 1843 the Devon Commission was set up 'to inquire into the state of the law and practice in respect of the occupation of land in Ireland'. Its report was presented in 1845 - at the start of the famine and too late for any effective action to take place. Peel also * told the new Viceroy, Bessborough, to give as much patronage as possible to Catholics Maynooth was a Roman Catholic seminary, which had been established in 1795 by Act of Parliament when the Jacobins closed the seminaries in France and Holland. The annual grant initially was £8,000. In 1807 the grant was raised to £12,000 but because of the outcry, it was reduced to £9,000 in 1808. By the 18-teens there were 200 students and 10 professors at Maynooth. Gladstone resigned over the Maynooth grant: he voted for it but believed that the views he had published in his book The Church and its Relations to the State (1838) made it impossible for him to continue in office as a supporter of the measure. The fact that hardly anyone had read the book, and fewer understood it, was irrelevant. Peel's comment, on receiving Gladstone's explanation for his resignation, was, "I really have great difficulty sometimes in exactly comprehending what he means". * set up secular university colleges in Galway, Belfast and Cork. Catholics and Protestants alike condemned the 'godless colleges'. In the end, those in Cork and Galway disappeared and only the College in Belfast flourished. In July 1846 'Connell engineered the expulsion of "Young Ireland" from the Repeal Association on the grounds that they would not totally, absolutely and for ever abjure the use of violence. By this time, Ireland was in the grip of the famine, and the political in-fighting was totally alienated from the realities of starvation and death. O'Connell died on 15 May 1847, while he was on his way to Rome to see the Pope. Also in 1847 John Mitchel was encouraging the peasants to arm themselves, for which he was expelled from "Young Ireland". He retaliated by setting up his own, overtly republican newspaper, the United Irishman. He began to call for 'Ireland her own, and all therein, from the sod to the sky. The soil of Ireland for the people of Ireland, to have and to hold from God alone.' This went much further than O'Connell had ever been prepared to go, for even in 1845 when he had begun to draw up an agrarian programme he had confined himself to proposals for * taxing absentee landlords
Daniel O'Connell (1775-1847) Daniel O'Connell, known as "the Liberator," was born on 6 August 1775 at a house called Derrynane, near Cahirciveen in County Kerry and was educated in France because as a Roman Catholic he was unable to go to University in Britain. He returned to Ireland, studied law, and was admitted to the bar in Dublin in 1798. He built up a highly successful practise as a lawyer and dealt with many cases of Irish tenants against English landlords. During the next two decades he was active in the movement to repeal British laws that penalized Roman Catholics because of their religion. Catholics were barred from Parliament but O'Connell became the leader of the battle to win political rights for Irish Roman Catholics. In 1823 he organised the Catholic Association, which played an important role in the passage of the Catholic Emancipation Act in 1829 (terms of the Act are here). O'Connell was elected to the House of Commons for County Clare in 1829 in what Sir Robert Peel called "an avalanche" but - although he was by law allowed to stand as a candidate - he was prevented from taking his seat because of the anti-Catholic legislation which was in force. He stood successfully for re-election in 1830 and remained an MP for various constituencies until his death. In the 1832 General Election O'Connell became MP for Dublin and also nominated about half of the candidates who were returned, including three of his sons and two of his sons-in-law. Of the 105 Irish MPs, some forty-five were declared Repealers: that is, they were committed to the repeal of the Act of Union. O'Connell fought fiercely against Grey's Coercion Act of 1833. O'Connell often allied himself with the Whigs in Parliament and was party to the Lichfield House Compact in 1834-35 along with Lord John Russell in a successful effort to cause the fall of Peel's first ministry. O'Connor became lord mayor of Dublin in 1841. As head of the Catholic Association he received a large annual income from voluntary contributions by the Irish people (the Catholic Rent of 1d a month) who supported him in a series of demonstrations in favour of Irish Home Rule. He was forced by Feargus O'Connor and other extremist Irish MPs to introduce the idea of Home Rule into parliament prematurely. In 1840 O'Connell founded the Repeal Association which was not nearly so successful as the Catholic Association until "Young Ireland" began to publish The Nation. After the demonstration at Clontarf in 1843 O'Connell was arrested and early in 1844 was convicted of seditious conspiracy. The conviction was subsequently reversed by the House of Lords on 4 September 1844 and O'Connell resumed his career. Among other things, he opposed Peel's establishment of the "godless colleges" in Belfast, Dublin, and Cork In 1845 the famine struck Ireland and the "Young Ireland" members of O'Connell's party began to advocate revolutionary doctrines that he had always opposed. Their arguments in favour of violent opposition to British rule led to an open split in Irish ranks in 1846. O'Connell was distressed by this disaffection among the Irish. Although suffering from ill health, he set off for Rome in January 1847 but died in Genoa on 15 May 1847. |
RELIGION 1815-1870
One of the best sources of information regarding the role of religion in Ireland during the period of the Union with England (United Kingdom) is found at the Cork Multi-text Project:
Ireland: culture & religion, 1815–1870
This was an important period for religious life in Ireland, when all churches faced challenges to their spiritual authority, or their status. Against a background of social and economic change, religious leaders tried to introduce reform, improve administration, and discipline their flocks. The churches were under increasing pressure from the secular world—from its ideas, its education and its cultural activities. In spite of all this there was an increase in religious fervour. In Protestant churches much of this can be explained by evangelicalism and its emphasis on a more ‘enthusiastic’ style of religious expression. After the Famine, following a period of reform and the loss of its poorest members, Catholicism was marked by religious renewal and a more public display of faith. Practice differed from person to person and from place to place. Religious faith itself is difficult to measure; for some it was an intensely private matter; for many it was a mixture of ritual and tradition, the social and spiritual behaviour of a community. In fact, it is almost impossible to separate religion and culture. However, there were many cultural activities that were entirely secular. Religious leaders increasingly found they had to compete for the leisure time of their flocks. 1. Religion in pre-famine Ireland The first statistics for religion in Ireland are contained in the 1831 Census, and these give us some idea of the proportionate strengths of the major denominations before the Famine. The great majority of the population, around 80.3%, were Catholic; 10.7% belonged to the Church of Ireland; and 8.1% were Presbyterian. Denominational membership was not, however, evenly distributed around the island. The north-east was distinctive. The counties of Antrim, Down, Armagh and Londonderry had Catholic minorities, while Fermanagh and Tyrone had almost equal numbers of Catholics and Protestants. Every other Irish county had a substantial Catholic majority. Moreover, because of earlier migrations from Scotland and England, 96% of all Irish Presbyterians were located in Ulster. The majority of Anglicans (56%) were also in the north-east, and the remainder were more generally dispersed throughout the island. The population of Ireland was, of course, dramatically affected by the Famine, and Catholics suffered greater losses than Protestants. The 1861 Census reflected the change: it recorded the population as 77.7% Catholic, 12% Anglican and 9% Presbyterian. Class and geography were important. Catholics were largely concentrated in the west and south of the country, and they made up the majority of the lower classes in society. There were other small religious groupings: such as Baptists, Congregationalists, Plymouth Brethren, Quakers and Methodists. Their numbers rose and fell over the course of the century. However, even taken together, these made up only a small percentage of the population. The Methodists were probably the most significant in terms of numbers and influence. None of the denominations operated in isolation. Apart from their interaction with each other, they were also affected by wider social and political events in Ireland itself, and were influenced, too, by international theological trends. 2. The Catholic Church The nineteenth century was a period of progress and reform for the Catholic Church following the removal of almost all of the legal obstacles imposed on it in the previous century. Only Catholic Emancipation—and particularly the right to sit in Parliament—remained to be achieved. Only then would full political participation be open to Irish Catholics. But the years of persecution had inevitably weakened the overall structure of the Church and its ability to function effectively. The most visible areas of concern were the shortage and inadequacy of church buildings and the lack of sufficient numbers of priests to deal with large and scattered congregations. It was estimated that in 1800 the ratio of priests to parishioners was about 1 to 2100. At the beginning of the century bishops felt the need to standardise religious practices and to exert their authority in matters of discipline. Progress was slow in the pre-Famine era. However, some important building work was begun and a new generation of reforming bishops brought their influence to bear on the lower clergy through regular conferences, retreats, and visitations. While priests were encouraged to improve their preaching and pastoral work, regulations were introduced to address personal standards of behaviour. Whilst discipline was tightened as a result of these measures, the rapid rate of population increase made any improvement in the ratio of priests to people impossible. Strong efforts were also made to regulate the behaviour of the wider Catholic community, particularly in regard to the rituals of faith. The restrictions of the previous century had led to a wide variation in religious practice and the merging of popular folk customs with Christian events. The ‘merry wake’ is probably the best example. While the priest delivered the last rites, the main activities surrounding the newly deceased were very much social and communal, from the keening women (mná caointe) following the funeral to the drinking, dancing, games, tricks and general horseplay enjoyed by family, friends and neighbours. In country areas the funeral mass was also often held in the home, as were marriages and baptisms, though the priest’s house sometimes provided an alternative venue. The Dublin diocesan statutes of 1831 ordered that the requiem and funeral mass be held in the church, and under Archbishop Cullen the administration of the sacraments was transferred from home to church. The secular traditions surrounding the wake, however, proved more resistant to reform, though the elements that were most offensive to the priests—mimicry of the sacraments, especially marriage, and satirical attacks on the clergy—had largely disappeared by the second half of the century. Boisterous behaviour at patterns (the feast day of a parish’s patron saint) also aroused the criticism of the hierarchy, who were particularly concerned about their Protestant counterparts and how they viewed the superstitious and immoral traditions which surrounded them. These pre-modern aspects of popular Catholicism presented the Church with significant challenges to its authority over social as well as religious life. 3. The Church of Ireland As part of the constitutional establishment, the Church of Ireland operated within a particularly difficult framework and its pastoral relationship with its parishioners was complicated by tasks of civil administration. The parish, operating as a kind of unofficial local parliament, was responsible for the upkeep of church buildings, schools, and roads; for the burial of the destitute; for the welfare of deserted children; and for looking after the poor. Such responsibilities ensured that Anglican clergy had considerable influence within the community, a situation reinforced by their strong social ties developed with local gentry. And while the church attracted a wide social range of followers amongst landlords, the professional and business classes and labouring families, the clergy themselves were most likely to come from gentry or professional backgrounds. Both the local and national power of the Established Church placed it in a position of privilege in relation to other religious denominations. This provoked considerable hostility from Catholics and Dissenters who greatly resented paying for the upkeep of a religious institution to which they did not belong. Representative of only a small minority in Ireland as a whole, it is not surprising that the Established Church was the target of much hostile criticism in this period. However, complaints also focused on the pastoral role of the Church and its ministers. Pluralism (clerical double jobbing) and non-residence were cited as obvious examples of apathy and neglect. The Church’s material and administrative inadequacies most clearly affected the services offered to the community, and the frequency with which divine service was held, communion celebrated and confirmations performed, was regarded as insufficient in many areas. Under pressure from an increasingly unsympathetic legislature, and under the critical scrutiny of the Presbyterian community, the Church of Ireland could not afford to be complacent. During the first decades of the nineteenth century the church engaged in a series of administrative improvements, redeploying its assets and reasserting its authority. By 1830 the province of Armagh could boast of 79 new benefices since 1782, while the number of glebe houses had increased to 93% of all parishes. Such improvements meant an increase in the number of resident clergy, church services, and communicants. Its success, while limited, was due to different causes. These included the committed churchmanship of an increasing number in both the upper and lower ranks of the Church, increased pressure from clergy and laity involved in evangelical societies, and the contribution of evangelicals striving to revitalise the Church from within. However, it was clear by the early 1830s that internal reform was not enough to satisfy the critics of the Church, in an age of increasing accountability. Amongst a series of legislative measures imposed by the Whig government was the Church Temporalities Act which reduced the number of bishoprics from 22 to 12, and it established a new body to deal with church administration and finance, the Ecclesiastical Commissioners of Ireland. The ancient and inefficient structure of the Church of Ireland was thus thoroughly overhauled, and more respect was paid to efficiency than to tradition. The controversial issue of tithes was also resolved by government intervention in 1838. The Church hierarchy, unsurprisingly, responded with alarm to what was believed to be an attack on property; but the vulnerability of the Protestant establishment in a mainly Catholic country would continue to increase over the course of the century. The activities of evangelicals posed a different challenge for Church leaders. Characterised by an emphasis on personal salvation, the centrality of the Cross and the authority of the Bible, evangelicalism had been an important though minor undercurrent in Irish religious life since the late eighteenth century. It was most visible as an organised movement within Methodism, but individual members of the clergy and laity of other denominations were also influenced by its challenge to contemporary religious lethargy. In the early decades of the nineteenth century a small number of Anglican clergy showed their evangelical tendencies by forming religious societies, engaging in outdoor preaching and co-operating with members of other denominations in the interests of spreading the gospel. Church leaders regarded this kind of activity as a threat both to the hierarchical structure and to the wider authority of the establishment. They also feared the possibility of religious division, even schism. But while extempore prayer and popular hymn-singing were at first seen as worrying developments by a Church rooted in liturgical tradition, these tensions eased as the century progressed. Indeed, the gradual development of evangelical churchmanship within the Church of Ireland proved that co-operation between orthodoxy and evangelicalism was not only possible but also desirable. By the second half of the 1830s, church extension work and the formation of diocesan societies showed the extent to which they could co-exist, and by the middle of the century the Anglican church in Ireland could be described as an evangelical institution. 4. The Presbyterian Church The Presbyterian Church in Ulster has been described as virtually ‘a state within a state’, a self-regulating community organised according to its own principles and virtually independent of the wider structures of church and state. While Catholics and Anglicans came under the authority of Rome and Westminster respectively, the Presbyterian community selected its own ministers, built its own churches, and administered its own discipline. But although technically a dissenting church in Ireland, it did receive an annual state grant, the regium donum. At the head of the numerically strong and geographically concentrated Presbyterian community was the Synod of Ulster, the provincial church government which had the loyalty of the vast majority of Ulster Presbyterians throughout the 18th and 19th century. There were, however, other significant minority groups such as the Covenanting or Reformed Presbyterian Church, which had originated in the second Scottish Reformation, and put down somewhat delicate roots in Ulster during the troubled years of the mid-seventeenth century. The Associate Synod, or the Seceders, a Scottish breakaway sect which began to make an impact in Ulster in the 1740s, was numerically stronger than the Covenanters, and particularly successful in competing with mainstream Presbyterianism. Combining conversionist zeal and a strong emphasis on fighting sin with rigid orthodoxy and strict discipline, the Seceders had organised a total of 16 congregations in Co. Down by 1818. There were also numerous doctrinal disputes and divisions within the Synod of Ulster itself. These were largely due to what has been described as ‘the inherent tension of Presbyterianism, between traditional ecclesiastical orthodoxy and the right of private judgment’. In the early nineteenth century the major disputes were connected with the ideas of Arianism and subscription to the Westminster Confession of Faith. Arianism meant a rejection of the traditional Christian doctrines of the divinity of Christ and the Trinity, a view offensive to more orthodox laity, and capable of creating bitter divisions. The frequency with which congregations took issue with each other, their ministers, or the synod, over such matters, and the consequent forming of breakaway groups, suggests a degree of disharmony at grassroots level. This could not only divide communities, but also significantly affect the cause of Presbyterianism in a locality. Matters came to a head in 1829, with the setting up of a separate Remonstrant Synod by the Arian Party, and the passing of a resolution that required full subscription to the Westminster Confession of Faith by all ministers in 1835. It is widely accepted in Presbyterian history that the split of 1829, begun by the Reverend Henry Cooke, was both recognition of the growth of evangelicalism within the church and a powerful stimulant to the evangelical cause. This was reflected in 1840 in the union of the Synod of Ulster and the Secession Synod into the new General Assembly and the beginning of a new era of missionary enterprise. 5. Methodism Although it accounts for only about 1.5% of the overall population, it is worth briefly looking at Methodism. It originated as a reforming society within the Church of England and was, by the nineteenth century, a distinct religious body. Methodist preachers travelled extensively throughout Ireland, preaching outdoors, forming local societies and spreading the message of justification by faith and Christian perfection. With its emotional class meetings, spiritual discipline and practical support, Methodism reached out to many of those neglected by the more established religions. The importance it attached to thrift and temperance perhaps appealed particularly to women, while the early use of women preachers introduced a dimension of novelty into popular religious life. It was particularly strong within traditional Anglican areas and in the ‘linen triangle’ of south Ulster. The province of Ulster was Methodism’s most successful recruiting ground: 68% of Irish Methodists living north of a line drawn from Sligo to Dundalk in 1815. Although very anti-Catholic, and specifically targeting the peasantry through Irish-speaking preachers, Methodism’s most important contribution to Irish society was the stimulus it gave to a much wider evangelicalism. During the course of the nineteenth century many Methodist characteristics, particularly itinerant preaching and the establishment of voluntary religious societies, were taken up by individuals, missionary organisations, and eventually the main churches themselves. 6. Religious divisions Each denomination was separated from the other by social, cultural and political as well as by theological distinctions. Despite internal divisions, Ulster Presbyterians, with their strong Scottish links and sense of religious and political identity, formed a close-knit community. Most Presbyterian ministers were local men, serving the middle-class, mainly farming communities, from which they came. On the other hand, while Anglican ministers were also likely to come from the educated middle classes, their adherents were more broadly representative of society in general. There is no doubt that evangelical outreach strategies introduced an element of rivalry into inter-church relations, but the most contentious area of competition was between Catholicism and the different branches of Protestantism. 7. Religious competition Protestant evangelicalism, vibrant and enthusiastic, was also assertively anti-Catholic, and hostility between the two major branches of Christianity became a marked feature of nineteenth-century Irish life. A proliferation of voluntary British religious agencies had made Ireland one of the chief targets for their conversionist zeal from around 1800. These established schools and distributed religious tracts and bibles. Their use of the Irish language to win over the peasantry was particularly irritating to the Catholic hierarchy. Against this background—and in the broader context of poor harvests, tithe wars and the growth of Orangeism—the 1820s witnessed a version of rural millenarianism. This was based on the prophecies of Pastorini [a pseudonym of Charles Walmsley], a Catholic prelate and mathematician. His millennial text a General History of the Christian Church …, written in 1790, predicted the downfall of Protestantism in 1821–5 and the triumphant emergence of the Catholic Church. A source of considerable embarrassment to the Catholic hierarchy, Pastorini was reported to be a household name in the South in 1822–3, especially in the Limerick area. His prophecy was widely believed in Ireland and the sixth edition of his book was published in Cork. Within a few years, however, the Catholic Emancipation campaign became the focus for many of the resentments that had earlier found expression in agrarian violence and for the mood of millenarian expectation that shortly before had made Pastorini so popular. The years 1826-7 saw the beginning of a more concerted evangelical challenge to Catholicism. The so-called ‘Second Reformation’ began in Co. Cavan with reports of the conversion of several tenants of the evangelical landlord, Lord Farnham. Accusations of proselytism quickly followed and were angrily refuted. However, the vulnerability of the tenantry (the linen industry in the area had virtually collapsed) and the extensive influence of the Farnhams were obviously significant factors. A challenge to the popularity of Daniel O’Connell’s Catholic Association, the Second Reformation movement also testified to the evangelical belief in religious solutions to political problems. As with the teaching and bible societies, the underlying motivation was the view that the only way of solving Ireland’s problems was through conversion of the majority of the population to Protestantism, not concession to their political demands. By October 1827 it was reported that there were 783 converts in Co. Cavan, but the ‘Reformation’ had little direct impact on other areas. Protestant evangelicals again came under attack in 1831, when famine on Achill Island inspired the Irish-speaker, the Reverend Edward Nangle, to establish a Protestant settlement there, aiming at the teaching and conversion of the Catholic population. He had a school which attracted 420 children within a year and a printing press dedicated to publishing attacks on ‘the idolatry of the Roman Mass’. This made Nangle’s settlement a focal point for evangelical visitors and, during the Famine of the 1840s, a target for accusations of ‘souperism’ , the use of food as bribery to win converts. The reformation movement was also concerned to draw attention to the distinctions between Catholic and Protestant doctrine, and to this end organised a series of great public meetings. Reports of attendance at these meetings, where Catholic and Protestant clergy hotly debated theological questions, are varied. They usually continued for several days and stirred up considerable religious tension. While the number of converts to Protestantism was probably insignificant, these public confrontations both fed upon, and contributed to, the sectarian disturbances of the period. It has also been said that the necessity of defending Catholic doctrine united all classes in defence of the ancient faith, and in fact probably served to entrench Catholicism in the minds of the ordinary people. For many members of the ascendancy class, the election of Daniel O’Connell and the granting of Catholic Emancipation, provoked fears for the future of Protestantism. Their anxiety was increased by the British Government’s educational policies, which had been designed to put an end to the religious competition in schools. The National System of Education, introduced in 1831, aimed to bring all children together for general literary instruction while separating them for religious doctrine. However, the idea of providing inter-denominational education served mainly to increase denominational rivalry, and the hostility of both Catholic and Protestant clergy forced the government to compromise its principles. The Churches’ control of schooling was not so easily given up. Religious conflict also marked developments in higher education. Trinity College Dublin, though attended by some middle- and upper-class Catholics, was largely a stronghold of the Anglo-Irish, and the Catholic hierarchy banned attendance there in 1875. The Government’s plans to establish provincial non-sectarian colleges in Cork, Galway and Belfast in 1848 also failed to meet religious demands. The Queen’s Colleges, which two years after their formation were linked as constituent colleges of Queen’s University, were dubbed ‘Godless’ by the Catholic hierarchy. The Catholic bishops founded an alternative Catholic University in Dublin in 1854, with Cardinal Newman as its head, but it struggled to survive. The ‘University Question’ (as it was called) remained largely unresolved until the early twentieth century. 8. Popular culture in pre-famine Ireland In the early nineteenth century education was also available in Sunday Schools attached to the various churches. While there were schools throughout the country, they were particularly important in Ulster where the proportion of Sunday scholars to population was 1:14 in 1831. In addition to their specifically religious objectives, Sunday Schools were expected to instil good manners, sound morals, and respectable appearance. However, for the children who attended, they also offered educational and recreational facilities, and made a distinctive contribution to working-class culture through their anniversary celebrations, street parades, Whitsun outings, book prizes, and benefit societies. Apart from education, another recurring theme in the evangelical crusade for moral reformation was temperance. Drunkenness was regarded as the prime cause of sexual immorality, gambling, broken homes, poverty, and social strife. The impetus for temperance societies originated in America, was taken up by local clergy of various denominations, and with the support of influential laymen spread rapidly throughout the province. By 1833, only four years after the first plans were published, there were 15,000 members of temperance societies in Ulster. The emphasis of these societies was on moderation rather than total abstention. The tee-total movement which was led by Father Mathew, began in 1838 and was a popular Roman Catholic crusade against ‘all intoxicating liquors’, and its medals, speeches, bands and banners provided a lively alternative to pub-based culture. Not only priests and evangelicals, but employers, landlords, radicals, and reformers in general supported the ‘improving’ movement, each viewing the advantages of a sober working class in a different light. The interest of employers in promoting the sobriety of their work force is self-evident, but Catholic nationalists were also convinced that the self-respect and self-esteem arising from sobriety could advance not only moral, but political aspirations. Around five million people were estimated to have taken the pledge in the first five years of Father Mathew’s movement. A decline in the popularity of whiskey drinking and general drunkenness was noted by many visitors and commissioners in this period, but the problem of drunkenness in Ireland was by no means solved. Many thousands remained unmoved by the crusade, while the resolutions of others were all too short-lived. Nor should all the responsibility for the reported decline in alcoholic consumption be attributed to the work of temperance campaigners. The introduction of revenue police and the reduction of duty on whiskey were undoubtedly significant factors in reducing the numbers of ‘shebeens’ and the local customs and festivities which surrounded them, while the increased supervision of ‘improving’ landlords and their agents was a further effective deterrent. Secret societies and faction fights, an important part of rural Irish society in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century did not die out completely. However, they were declining in significance, aided by the condemnations of the clergy and Daniel O’Connell and, from 1836, the presence of the Royal Irish Constabulary. The Famine greatly accelerated social changes already under way. The portrayal of pre-Famine Ireland in literature is very significant for social history. The work of William Carleton (1794-1869) has been acknowledged as an important source. Carleton’s own hedge-school education and carefree youth provided him with abundant materials for the lively tales of Irish peasant life which are an important part of our cultural heritage. Close familiarity and direct experience give life and vigour to Carleton’s portrayals of local events and characters, ensuring their popularity. Traits and Stories of the Irish Peasantry, first published in 1830–3, went though several editions. Evidence of popular culture is difficult to find in the more traditional archives and, while writers such as Charles Lever and Samuel Lover contributed to the popular image of the stage Irishman as a drunken buffoon, Carleton’s vivid portrayals reflected a wider experience. His stories of wakes and weddings, faction fights, country dances, drinking dens, and sporting rivalries—events at the very core of community life—prompted J. M. Synge (1871–1909), the playwright, to call Carleton the ‘father of Irish literature’. There was, however, at least at intellectual levels, growing opposition both to the stereotypical view of Irish life, and the gradual encroachment of England evidenced in sports, literature, music-hall entertainment and, importantly, in the decline of the Irish language. The Royal Irish Academy, founded in 1785, had become the centre of scholarly study of Ireland’s ancient civilisation. Editions and translations of Gaelic poetry, legends and sagas were published by poets and scholars such as James Clarence Mangan, Samuel Ferguson, George Petrie, John O’Donovan, Eugene O’Curry and others. O’Donovan published his monumental edition of the Annals of the Four Masters in 1848–51, revealing the rich sources in Irish for the medieval history of the Irish church and of society, while Bishop William Reeves and J. H. Todd studied the early centuries of Irish Christianity. They drew scholarly attention to a country that developed an outstanding literary and religious culture in the early middle ages, a land of saints and scholars whose missionaries and teachers made a major contribution to the creation of Europe’s Christian civilisation. Their work was particularly important because it provided a new set of symbols for Ireland. George Petrie edited a very important popular but high-quality magazine, the Dublin Penny Journal, that carried well-crafted articles on Irish antiquities and history, many written by himself. Ferguson wrote in 1840 of its important role in ‘bringing back to the light of intellectual day, the already recorded facts by which the people of Ireland will be able to live back, in the land they live in’. Later, Petrie established the Irish Penny Journal to inform the people at large of Irish cultural achievements in the past. The approach of Thomas Davis in the 1840s was something new: cultural nationalism and the creation of an Irish identity in English. He took Ireland’s past from the scholars and brought it to the people. He and his associates popularised Ireland’s cultural heritage—in story, in history, in rousing ballads—to re-affirm ‘the pedigree of her nationhood’, to rekindle a pride in her history and language. The Young Ireland movement (and here Davis played a leading part, together with the Catholic journalist Charles Gavan Duffy and the Catholic barrister John Blake Dillon) was strongly influenced by wider European romantic nationalism. Young Ireland spread its ideas through the Nation, its weekly newspaper. The movement never won mass support, and its attempted rising in 1848 was doomed from the start. Nonetheless, its legacy is impressive. Later generations built on Young Ireland’s concern for Irish culture—the Irish language, Irish music, art and history. 9. Catholicism after the famine The Great Famine was the most serious disaster of the century, an ‘event of cosmic significance’ during which superstition and fears were rife. Research suggests that the initial Catholic folk interpretation of the Famine was in terms of a supernatural judgement, God’s wrath and divine punishment of the people’s sins, a view apparently encouraged by the Church. It does indeed seem that the psychological shock of these years led to an increase in religious faith and practice. The loss of around two million of the poorest of its people ensured that the Catholic Church emerged from the period of famine in a stronger position to carry out its pastoral role. Indeed, it has been claimed that the confidence and progress of Irish Catholicism between 1850 and 1875 was marked by a ‘Devotional Revolution’. A major factor in the shaping of the Church in these years was the leadership of Paul Cullen. He arrived in Ireland from Rome as papal delegate and Archbishop of Armagh in 1850, was translated to Dublin in 1852, and became Ireland’s first cardinal in 1866. As a reformer and ecclesiastical politician, Cullen created the modern Irish Catholic Church, regulated its clergy and its practices, and bound it closely to Rome. His work benefited from the progress made in the first half of the nineteenth century, and the changed conditions following the Famine. Cullen strengthened the relationship between a more devout people and their more disciplined clergy. The Synod of Thurles, convened by Cullen in 1850, marked the beginning of a more tightly controlled religious regime. The ratio of priests to people had been reduced to 1:1250, and as a result of an increased Government grant to Maynooth, after 1845, many of these priests were more likely to be from the lower ranks of Catholic society. Cullen’s leadership was Rome-centred (Ultramontane) and he was keenly aware of the danger of an Irish-based nationalistic Catholicism (Gallicanism), of which Archbishop John McHale of Tuam was a volatile and outspoken advocate. Cullen, a skilled diplomat, easily outplayed him. Cullen was deeply hostile to the physical force tradition in Irish politics, and he strongly condemned the Fenian movement. However, he was primarily an ecclesiastical reformer, deeply committed to the papacy and anxious to make the Irish Catholic Church conform, to the fullest possible extent, with the Roman model. The results of these combined circumstances were already clear by the end of this period. The celebration of the sacraments in the home became a rare occurrence; confession and communion were much more frequent; the number of Sunday sermons increased; and more people than ever before attended mass. Many new churches were built; and new Roman-style devotions flourished. Retreats and parish missions organised by the religious orders provided the opportunity for spiritual renewal and a proliferation of confraternities and sodalities encouraged religious practice amongst the laity. A massive increase in the numbers of religious orders influenced all levels of Catholic social life and religious practice. The number of nuns, which stood at 120 in 1800, had risen to 3,700 by 1870. Teaching orders of brothers, particularly the Irish Christian Brothers, also substantially increased in number. Through their work in schools in particular, this para-clerical church personnel had a powerful influence on the youth and did much to ensure the dominance of a strict Catholic ethos. As many have remarked, the sexually conservative nature of late nineteenth-century Ireland was one consequences of the Church’s increased control, especially of the middle classes. 10. Post-famine Protestantism One of the few high points in nineteenth-century Protestant religious life occurred in Ulster in 1859. Known as the ‘Second Great Awakening’, this religious revival which swept over much of the province shows how evangelicalism had infiltrated mainstream religion by the middle of the nineteenth century. Although the Presbyterian heartlands of Antrim and Down were most strongly affected, the counties of Londonderry and Tyrone also witnessed the ‘miraculous manifestations, marvellous conversions and mysterious prostrations’ that characterised the ‘Great Revival’. Methodists and Anglicans were also affected, but Catholics remained largely immune. Although the roots of the revival can be found in the gradual spread and growing acceptance of evangelical activity in all Protestant churches from the beginning of the nineteenth century, this particular outbreak of religious excitement began amongst a group of young men who met together for prayer, and the laity played a key role in sustaining and spreading the movement. The original converts, on praying and preaching tours throughout the countryside, caused great excitement in churches and meeting houses. While many Protestant clergy welcomed what was claimed as a genuine outpouring of the spirit, some took a more cautious approach because of the physical phenomena that often accompanied dramatic conversions. The physical prostrations, faintings and ‘strikings down’, which were the most controversial characteristics of the 1859 revival, were felt by some to be fraud or delusion and, although they affected only a minority of converts, they caused considerable local excitement. Promoters of the revival made great claims for its success, estimating that they had made around 100,000 converts in all. These statistics must, however, be treated with caution as many ‘converts’ were probably those on the periphery of church rather than drunkards, villains and the like. Another significant consequence of this period of revivalism was the growth of those denominations that required a more visible and positive commitment from their adult members. For example, the Plymouth Brethren particularly benefited. It is unlikely that the revival had such a direct effect on the lives of most ordinary men and women, though one would imagine that in small, close-knit communities the pressure to conform might be considerable. Most importantly, the revival gave a boost to Protestant confidence on the eve of further political assaults. It is ironic that the Church of Ireland was being undermined by political events beyond its control just when administrative reform and evangelical zeal made its pastoral mission more efficient. But Disestablishment, the separation of church and state, an almost inevitable consequence of the Liberal Government’s attempts to deal with the problems of Ireland, united Protestants of all creeds against the perceived threat from Catholicism. For example, the Presbyterian leader Henry Cooke headed an emotional display of Protestant solidarity in Hillsborough in 1867. It was one of the major demonstrations against Gladstone’s policy. Such instances of solidarity temporarily overcame narrower theological distinctions. However, when it came in 1869 (Irish Church Act), Disestablishment was on favourable terms. Protestant interests were looked after and proper provisions were made for the Church of Ireland’s future. A Temporalities Commission was established to manage church revenue and the Representative Church Body set up to deal with legal and administrative matters. It has been argued that the constitutional withdrawal of the British Government from religion in Ireland left the churches free to focus on their pastoral and spiritual mission. 11. Sectarianism What really united the Protestant denominations was anti-Catholicism, and during the second half of the nineteenth century tensions between the religious communities frequently spilled over into violent sectarian conflict. In 1849, for example, at Dolly’s Brae near Castlewellan in Co. Down, a clash between Ribbonmen and Orangemen resulted in the deaths of six Catholics. While such rural conflicts had been common since the late eighteenth century, demographic shifts brought sectarianism to Belfast where it was to have lasting impact on culture, politics, and religion. The proportion of Catholics in the city, estimated at 16% in 1808, had increased to 31.9% by 1871 and, while religious riots in the town were rare before 1830, in the following decades sectarian clashes became more frequent and more violent. Competition for jobs and the activities of the Orange Order were contributory factors but so, too, were the popular and controversial outpourings of evangelical preachers. Anglican Thomas Drew and Presbyterian Hugh Hanna are prime examples of clerical leadership which, by graphically denouncing the ‘errors’ of Rome in open-air sermons, contributed to outbreaks of sectarian rioting. Thus the religious leadership, whether from Sunday morning pulpits or the speakers’ platform at the Great Protestant meetings in Hillsborough, carried a weighty responsibility. Their sermons often determined the nature of local community relations. 12. Post-famine culture A major consequence of social change in these years was the decline of the Irish language. The regions and the social classes where Irish was most prevalent were hardest hit by the Famine, emigration, and the subsequent process of change. The language was increasingly seen as ‘old-fashioned’, signifying poverty and ignorance rather than tradition and culture. The usual language of ‘modern’ everyday life—newspapers, schools, administration, and religion (whether Catholic or Protestant)—was English, and in a world where all these were becoming increasingly important the Irish language was bound to decline. Although not solely responsible for the decline in the Irish language, the national system of education did help to bring about mass literacy in English. When this was combined with changes in the methods of book production and in printing technology, the printed word in English became more readily available to all classes. Most medium-sized towns had at least one bookshop. In smaller towns and villages throughout the country, books could be bought, or even hired in the local grocery stores. Chapmen, itinerant small traders who plied their wares—clothing, combs, and small items of hardware—from door to door in country areas, also carried books. Reading materials was also accessed through a range of libraries. Despite the passage of the Public Libraries (Ireland) Act of 1855, rate-supported libraries were very slow to start. While subscriptions to commercial libraries were beyond the reach of many, landlords and clergy, intent on improvement, frequently established their own lending libraries. The material available to the new reading public was diverse and generally reflected a culture beyond the shores of the island. Traditional tales such as Aesop’s Fables or the Arabian Nights, tales of travel, adventure or disaster, and histories were all popular, as were cheap translations of French novels. Indeed the popularity of these was a matter of concern for religious bodies who themselves swamped the market was religious tracts and pamphlets. Specifically Irish material was more limited, though the theme of the Rebellion of 1798 did attract some writers, and collections such as Irish Legendary Tales and Royal Hibernian Tales were available. By mid century, editions of cheap quality literature were also being made available through series such as the Parlour Library. Newspapers were, of course, an important source of news, opinions, and information although until 1861 high taxation limited their circulation. However, they were widely read, they passed around in reading rooms and public houses, and their contents was discussed at length in a variety of venues. In terms of culture more generally, a combination of secular and religious influences was having an effect on behavioural patterns during this period. Changes in farming methods, urbanisation, industrialisation, and a shift to a money economy led to the greater regularisation and organisation of leisure time. The influence of churches has already been noted. It seems that, generally speaking, a more ‘respectable’ and religious strong-farmer culture was replacing the old habits of the shebeens and riotous wakes. Nonetheless, weddings and funerals, hiring fairs and markets, the departure or return of emigrants, and harvest homes were all occasions of sociability, merriment, music, and dancing. In rural areas, ‘crossroads’ dancing was common on summer Sunday evenings while even in the Dublin slums, tenement families enjoyed gossip and regular ‘hooleys’. Ballads and music, passed on from one generation to the next, were enjoyed in a range of venues, from humble cottages, to city streets to community gatherings of all kinds. The new railway network was also important, enabling individuals, couples and families to travel to the seaside or countryside for day trips, weekends, or even longer periods during Easter and Summer holidays. While holidays were a rare luxury for the poor, for the wealthy they were a way of life and made easier by the advances in travel. The London season was viewed in upper-class circles as an essential cultural and social opportunity—a time for the women to catch up on the latest fashions and for the men to renew acquaintances at their clubs, while both enjoyed the latest plays. Visits to the cultural centres of Europe were regular, and were seen as being particularly important educational experiences for upper-class young men and as providing the ‘finishing’ touches to the education of wealthy young women. ‘Culture’ was, of course, also available at home, and light opera was on offer at several venues. Between 1841 and 1867 a total of twenty-two different music societies were founded for the middle and upper classes. Larger audiences enjoyed the programmes of Grand National Concerts of Irish Music, consisting of more popular tunes, such as Moore’s Melodies. While cultural, as well as religious experience, was diverse and multi-faceted, the influence of Ireland’s dominant neighbour was strong. In the last decades of the nineteenth century, the nationalist challenge to this creeping anglicisation, mostly the work of the Gaelic League (Connradh na Gaedhilge), resulted in the resurgence of a Catholic Irish culture which, being both Gaelic and Catholic, would greatly strengthen one aspect of culture at the expense of a more inclusive diversity. Dr Myrtle Hill
|